No power cooling tower-water turbine
Condition:New | Cooling Type:Counter Flow | Material:FRP | Place of Origin:Jiangsu China (Mainland) |
Brand Name:HuiYa | Model Number:100T-5000T | Voltage:0V | Power(W):0KW |
Dimension(L*W*H):Customized | Weight:Customized | Certification:GB/T19001-2000 and ISO9001:2000 | Warranty:one year(exclude wearing parts ) |
After-sales Service Provided:Engineers available to service machinery overseas |
1. Technical Principles
Hydraulic fan, as the name suggests, it is to use water other than traditional electricity to drive the fan. In hydraulic fan cooling tower, hydraulic turbine is used to replace motor as the power source for fan. Driving force for running hydraulic turbine comes from surplus energy of the system.
2. Technical Advantages
1) Visible effects, 100% energy saving of fans and motors, and the recovery period is about one and a half years.
2) Eliminate all the electrical systems, which leads to easy maintenance, low failure rate, and high safety performance.
3) Low maintenance costs.
4) Short reconstruction period, with no major change in entire circulating water system, can usually be completed within 7-10 days.
5) Double water inlets reduce vibration and noise.
6) High energy utilization rate of the system surplus energy, with the total utilization rate of about 90%.
7) Push the water pump operating point to the high efficient area, so as to operate at the best conditions, while saving energy,
it also extends equipment use life.
Comparison Table of Power Consumption between Traditional Cooling Tower and Water Kinetic Energy
Cooling Tower
Cooling Tower Specification (Ton/Hour) | Fan Power (KW) | Daily Power Consumption of Fan (KWH) | Annual Power Consumption of Fan (KWH) | Power Consumption of Water Kinetic Energy Cooling Tower (KWH) | Energy-saving Efficiency (RMB/10,000) |
1,000 | 45 | 1,080 | 356,400 | 0 | 19.60 |
2,000 | 90 | 2,160 | 712,800 | 39.20 | |
3,000 | 132 | 3,168 | 1,045,440 | 57.50 | |
4,000 | 160 | 3,840 | 1,267,200 | 69.70 | |
5,000 | 200 | 4,800 | 1,584,000 | 87.12 |
Performance Comparison Table
Comparison Items between Traditional Cooling Tower and Water Kinetic Energy Recovery Cooling Tower | Traditional Cooling Tower | Water Kinetic Energy Recovery Cooling Tower |
Water | It is necessary to compensate water often | It is unnecessary to compensate water often |
Electricity | Every one hundred tons circulating water consumes 4-6 KWH power each hour. | No power consumption |
Operating Cost | High | Low |
Reliability | It is necessary to often carry out routine maintenance for electric motor and reduction gear box | It is unnecessary to often carry out routine maintenance for electric motor and reduction gear box |
Safety | It is necessary to equip with explosion-proof motor and electric control device | It may work in any areas which require explosion-proof |
Environmental Protection | Water drift, nose, and vibration impact on the environment | No pollution |
Cooling Effect | Good | Good |
Water Drift Rate | Higher | Lower |
Applicability | Suitable for any circumstances which require mechanical ventilation cooling tower | Suitable for any circumstances which require mechanical ventilation cooling tower |
Mechanical Noise | Large | Little |
Packaging Detail:Exporting Wooden package or Steel package |
Delivery Detail:within 40days after order confirmation |